According to Diller and Rivera, the four major Hispanic/Latino subgroups in America are comprised of

According to Diller and Rivera, the four major Hispanic/Latino subgroups in America are comprised of

• A. Cuban Americans, Mexican Americans, Dominican Americans, and Haitian
• B. Cuban Americans, Dominican Americans, Haitians, and Mexican Americans
• C. Cuban Americans, Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Central/South Americans
• D. Cuban Americans, Dominican Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Mexican Americans

Answer: (C)

In this framework, the Hispanic/Latino population is understood as consisting of four major subgroups that represent the largest and most distinct origins in the U.S. These four are Cuban Americans, Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Central/South Americans. The emphasis on Central/South Americans reflects a broad category that captures a wide range of national origins (such as countries in Central and South America) that together form a substantial portion of the Latino population and bring diverse immigration histories and experiences. Why this set fits best: it aligns with how the literature organizes Hispanic/Latino diversity around the major, historically prominent groups plus a broad category for the many other origins. The other options mix in groups like Dominicans or Haitians, which are Caribbean but not included as one of the four major subgroups in this particular scheme, and thus don’t fit the framework described by Diller and Rivera.

In this framework, the Hispanic/Latino population is understood as consisting of four major subgroups that represent the largest and most distinct origins in the U.S. These four are Cuban Americans, Mexican Americans, Puerto Ricans, and Central/South Americans. The emphasis on Central/South Americans reflects a broad category that captures a wide range of national origins (such as countries in Central and South America) that together form a substantial portion of the Latino population and bring diverse immigration histories and experiences.

Why this set fits best: it aligns with how the literature organizes Hispanic/Latino diversity around the major, historically prominent groups plus a broad category for the many other origins. The other options mix in groups like Dominicans or Haitians, which are Caribbean but not included as one of the four major subgroups in this particular scheme, and thus don’t fit the framework described by Diller and Rivera.