Corey et al. suggest strategies to lessen negative feelings and resistance in adolescent groups. Which option is NOT among those suggestions?

Corey et al. suggest strategies to lessen negative feelings and resistance in adolescent groups. Which option is NOT among those suggestions?

• A. Meeting first individually with each member
• B. Working with, not against, resistance
• C. Introducing members to rules immediately
• D. Responding to sarcasm with honest, firm, caring statements

Answer: (C)

In adolescent group work, building trust and reducing defensiveness is essential for participation and openness. Corey and colleagues emphasize strategies that establish rapport, address resistance constructively, and set boundaries in a respectful way. Meeting with each member individually helps the leader understand personal concerns and tailor the approach, which lowers fear and defensiveness. When resistance arises, it’s best to work with it—acknowledging concerns, validating feelings, and guiding the group to collaborate on solutions rather than trying to coerce members to change. Responding to sarcasm with honest, firm, caring statements models clear, respectful communication and helps maintain safety and predictability in the group. Introducing members to rules immediately tends to shift the dynamic toward control and can provoke increased resistance rather than cooperation. Rules are more effectively established after some initial trust and rapport have been built, often through collaborative discussion about norms and expectations. The other strategies promote engagement and a constructive atmosphere, whereas a top-down imposition of rules typically undermines early group development.

In adolescent group work, building trust and reducing defensiveness is essential for participation and openness. Corey and colleagues emphasize strategies that establish rapport, address resistance constructively, and set boundaries in a respectful way. Meeting with each member individually helps the leader understand personal concerns and tailor the approach, which lowers fear and defensiveness. When resistance arises, it’s best to work with it—acknowledging concerns, validating feelings, and guiding the group to collaborate on solutions rather than trying to coerce members to change. Responding to sarcasm with honest, firm, caring statements models clear, respectful communication and helps maintain safety and predictability in the group.

Introducing members to rules immediately tends to shift the dynamic toward control and can provoke increased resistance rather than cooperation. Rules are more effectively established after some initial trust and rapport have been built, often through collaborative discussion about norms and expectations. The other strategies promote engagement and a constructive atmosphere, whereas a top-down imposition of rules typically undermines early group development.